|
|
Three Round, Draft-in-Progress, Pick-by-Pick Draft Analysis
NOTE - these are my initial
impressions as the picks were made -
my thoughts may change when I do my detailed analysis and view a team's
entire draft.
Rounds
1 and 2 POSTED 04/25/09, Round 3 POSTED 04/26/09 right after day
one of the draft
ROUND 1
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY
GOLDBERG's INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
1 |
DET |
Stafford |
QB |
Georgia |
Can't
argue, but I'm in the minority and in line with Lion fans who
wanted Curry. |
| 2 |
2 |
STL |
Smith |
OT |
Baylor |
Disagree, while
the Rams needed a tackle and Smith is going to be a good one
they will regret passing on Sanchez. |
| 3 |
3 |
KC |
Jackson |
DE |
LSU |
Disagree,
if the Chiefs wanted a piece upfront for their 3-4 defense, they
should have gone Raji for the nose, not Jackson for end. |
| 4 |
4 |
SEA |
Curry |
LB |
Wake
Forest |
Agree
with selection |
| 5 |
5 |
NYJ |
Sanchez |
QB |
USC |
Agree
with selection |
| 6 |
6 |
CIN |
Smith |
OT |
Alabama |
Can't
argue, but I would have drafted Orakpo, the Bengals also badly
need an edge rusher. |
| 7 |
7 |
OAK |
Heyward-Bey |
WR |
Maryland |
Mistake,
Crabtree or at worst Macklin should have been the pick.
Heyward-Bey will be okay, but the other two will be better. |
| 8 |
8 |
JAC |
Monroe |
OT |
Virginia |
Agree
with selection |
| 9 |
9 |
GB |
Raji |
DT |
Boston
Col |
Agree
with selection |
| 10 |
10 |
SF |
Crabtree |
LB |
Texas
Tech |
Agree
with selection |
| 11 |
11 |
BUF |
Maybin |
DE |
Penn
St |
Can't
argue he's a top pass rusher, but is he big enough to play end
every down? Would Orakpo have been better here? |
| 12 |
12 |
DEN |
Moreno |
RB |
Georgia |
Mistake,
Moreno was my #3 rated running back and Denver needed pieces for
their 3-4 defense like Maualuga or English at this spot. |
| 13 |
13 |
WAS |
Orakpo |
DE |
Texas |
Agree
with selection |
| 14 |
14 |
NO |
Jenkins |
CB |
Ohio
State |
Disagree,
while Jenkins will be a solid safety, I'm not sure he'll be a
top starter at corner; Cushing would have been my pick. |
| 15 |
15 |
HOU |
Cushing |
LB |
USC |
Agree
with selection |
| 16 |
16 |
SD |
English |
LB |
N
Illinois |
Can't
argue as Merriman-insurance, but Maualuga or Wells would have
been my pick. |
| 17 |
17 |
TB |
Freeman |
QB |
Kansas
St |
Disagree,
I like Josh Johnson as a future starter, I would have gone
Macklin, he would have been dynamite opposite Bryant. |
| 18 |
18 |
DEN |
Ayers |
LB |
Tennessee |
Disagree,
Maualuga would have been my pick, I'm not sure Ayers will be
effective at outside linebacker. |
| 19 |
19 |
PHI |
Macklin |
WR |
Missouri |
Agree
with selection |
| 20 |
20 |
DET |
Pettigrew |
TE |
Oklahoma
St |
Disagree,
should have gone Oher or Maualuga, Pettigrew is a bit overrated. |
| 21 |
21 |
CLE |
Mack |
OC |
California |
Can't
argue, but how nice would Wells look in a Browns' uniform. |
| 22 |
22 |
MIN |
Harvin |
WR |
Florida |
Agree
with selection |
| 23 |
23 |
BAL |
Oher |
OT |
Mississippi |
Can't
argue, but why is Maualuga slipping, he would have been
intriguing here as well? |
| 24 |
24 |
ATL |
Jerry |
DT |
Mississippi |
Can't
argue, but Matthews had to be tempting as well. |
| 25 |
25 |
MIA |
Davis |
CB |
Illinois |
Can't
argue, but I like corners Butler and A Smith a bit better for
consistency sake. |
| 26 |
26 |
GB |
Matthews |
LB |
USC |
Agree
with selection |
| 27 |
27 |
IND |
Brown |
RB |
Connecticut |
Agree
with selection |
| 28 |
28 |
BUF |
Wood |
OC |
Louisville |
Agree
with selection |
| 29 |
29 |
NYG |
Nicks |
WR |
N
Carolina |
Agree
with selection |
| 30 |
30 |
TEN |
Britt |
WR |
Rutgers |
Can't
argue, but don't give up on Hawkins yet, I still believe he will
be a good NFL player. |
| 31 |
31 |
ARZ |
Wells |
RB |
Ohio
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 32 |
32 |
PIT |
Hood |
DT |
Missouri |
Agree
with selection |
ROUND 2
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY
GOLDBERG's INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
33 |
DET |
Delmas |
FS |
W
Michigan |
Can't
argue, but Maualuga would have looked good in the middle of
their defense. |
| 2 |
34 |
NE |
Chung |
SS |
Oregon |
Agree
with selection |
| 3 |
35 |
STL |
Laurinaitis |
LB |
Ohio
State |
Disagree,
I like Maualuga more than Laurinaitis. |
| 4 |
36 |
CLE |
Robiskie |
WR |
Ohio
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 5 |
37 |
DEN |
Smith |
CB |
Kansas
St |
Can't
argue he's a very good player, but giving up a number one for
next year? Well, I say yes! |
| 6 |
38 |
CIN |
Maualuga |
LB |
USC |
Agree
with selection |
| 7 |
39 |
JAC |
Britton |
OT |
Arizona |
Can't
argue, but I would have gone with Derrick Williams. |
| 8 |
40 |
NE |
Brace |
DT |
Boston
Col |
Agree
with selection |
| 9 |
41 |
NE |
Butler |
CB |
Connecticut |
Can't
argue, as long as they get an OLB at 58, otherwise Barwin would
have been my pick. |
| 10 |
42 |
BUF |
Bryd |
CB |
Oregon |
Mistake;
as a corner there are many better; as a safety he fits here but
I would have gone Beatty especially since Simpson still has
potential. |
| 11 |
43 |
CAR |
Brown |
DE |
Florida
St |
Agree
with selection |
| 12 |
44 |
MIA |
White |
QB |
West
Virg |
Agree
with selection |
| 13 |
45 |
NYG |
Sintim |
LB |
Virginia |
Mistake,
he played in a 3-4 and Giants base defense is a 4-3, I would
have drafted Brinkley to take over in the middle in a year or so
for Pierce or Beatty to groom for left tackle. |
| 14 |
46 |
HOU |
Barwin |
DE |
Colorado |
Agree
with selection |
| 15 |
47 |
OAK |
Mitchell |
SS |
Ohio |
Mistake,
at safety how about Moore, Hamlin or Vaughn, also Beatty at tackle
would have made more sense. |
| 16 |
48 |
DEN |
McBath |
FS |
Texas
Tech |
Disagree,
I like Moore better at free safety and would have gone with
Gilbert to play end in the 3-4. |
| 17 |
49 |
SEA |
Unger |
OC |
Oregon |
Agree
with selection |
| 18 |
50 |
CLE |
Massaquoi |
WR |
Georgia |
Can't
argue I like Massaquoi, but I would have gone with A Brown as
Lewis-insurance. |
| 19 |
51 |
BUF |
Levitre |
OG |
Oregon
St |
Disagree,
I have Urbik as my to rated guard. |
| 20 |
52 |
CLE |
Veikune |
LB |
Hawaii |
Agree
with selection |
| 21 |
53 |
PHI |
McCoy |
RB |
Pittsburgh |
Mistake,
I would have gone with Goodson or Ringer as a Westbrook-like
back or Brown as a big back. |
| 22 |
54 |
MIN |
Loadholt |
OT |
Oklahoma |
Can't
argue, he should be a good right tackle, but I like Beatty
better. |
| 23 |
55 |
ATL |
Moore |
SS |
Missouri |
Agree
with selection |
| 24 |
56 |
IND |
Moala |
DT |
USC |
Agree
with selection |
| 25 |
57 |
BAL |
Kruger |
DE |
Utah |
Disagree,
while Kruger is good he is too small for end and too slow for
OLB in the Ravens' 3-4 defense, I would have gone Brinkley. |
| 26 |
58 |
NE |
Vollmer |
OT |
Houston |
Can't
argue, I had him going to New England in round three in my mock,
but this was a bit high for him. |
| 27 |
59 |
CAR |
Martin |
CB |
Troy |
Mistake,
at corner I had a number better than Martin including Smith,
Lewis, and Harris; however my pick would have been TE Nelson. |
| 28 |
60 |
NYG |
Beatty |
OT |
Connecticut |
Agree
with selection |
| 29 |
61 |
MIA |
Smith |
CB |
Utah |
Can't
argue, but I would have drafted wide receiver Derrick Williams. |
| 30 |
62 |
TEN |
Marks |
DT |
Auburn |
Agree
with selection |
| 31 |
63 |
ARZ |
Brown |
LB |
Connecticut |
Agree
with selection |
| 32 |
64 |
DEN |
Quinn |
TE |
N
Carolina |
Disagree,
while Quinn fits the new scheme very well, I still would have
gone Gilbert to play end in their 3-4. |
ROUND 3
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY
GOLDBERG's INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
65 |
NYJ |
Greene |
RB |
Iowa |
Can't
argue, Jones is asking for more money and is getting up in age,
but I would have gone Derrick Williams to play opposite Cotchery. |
| 2 |
66 |
STL |
Fletcher |
CB |
Iowa |
Can't
argue, I like Fletcher but Brinkley would have been my pick to
play MIKE so Witherspoon could move to WILL. |
| 3 |
67 |
KC |
McGee |
DE |
Purdue |
Can't
argue, he is a steady player, probably an end in the 3-4, but I
like Gilbert's upside better at end. |
| 4 |
68 |
CHI |
Gilbert |
DE |
San
Jose St |
Agree
with selection |
| 5 |
69 |
DAL |
Williams |
LB |
W
Illinois |
Can't
argue, but I like Vaughn for strong safety a bit more at this
spot. |
| 6 |
70 |
CIN |
Johnson |
DE |
Geo
Tech |
Agree
with selection |
| 7 |
71 |
OAK |
Shaughnessy |
DE |
Wisconsin |
Mistake,
at end I like Sidbury Jr. and Kyle Moore much better. My
pick would have been Jamon Meredith. |
| 8 |
72 |
JAC |
Knighton |
DT |
Temple |
Mistake,
while Knighton is a big kid, Dorell Scott is big and strong and
Ray Miller is strong and talented. |
| 9 |
73 |
JAC |
Cox |
CB |
William
& Mary |
Agree
with selection |
| 10 |
74 |
SF |
Coffee |
RB |
Alabama |
Mistake,
I have Andre Brown and Rashad Jennings rated higher as big
backs, Javon Ringer and Mike Goodson rated higher as smaller
backs. |
| 11 |
75 |
DAL |
Brewster |
OT |
Ball
State |
Mistake,
too high for Brewster who will be a guard; my choice would have
been Vaughn or at guard, Urbik. |
| 12 |
76 |
DET |
Levy |
LB |
Wisconsin |
Mistake,
he played outside in college but the Lions may be projecting him
to the middle (already have Peterson and Sims outside); I would
have drafted Brinkley or even Beckwith at this spot. |
| 13 |
77 |
HOU |
Caldwell |
OC |
Alabama |
Can't
argue, but I would have gone Macho Harris at corner. |
| 14 |
78 |
SD |
Vazquez |
OG |
Texas
Tech |
Can't
argue, he is one of the better athletes at guard, but Urbik
would have been my pick. |
| 15 |
79 |
PIT |
Urbik |
OG |
Wisconsin |
Agree
with selection |
| 16 |
80 |
WAS |
Barnes |
CB |
Maryland |
Can't
argue, Barnes is talented and a great athlete, however, I had a
couple of corners rated slightly higher but Barnes here is fine. |
| 17 |
81 |
TB |
Miller |
DT |
Texas |
Agree
with selection |
| 18 |
82 |
DET |
Williams |
WR |
Penn
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 19 |
83 |
NE |
Tate |
WR |
N
Carolina |
Can't
argue, maybe Randy Moss will be a good influence, however I
would have love Brinkley inside in the Pats defense to play next
to Mayo, also Wallace opposite Moss would have been scary. |
| 20 |
84 |
PIT |
Wallace |
WR |
Mississippi |
Agree
with selection |
| 21 |
85 |
NYG |
Barden |
WR |
Cal-Poly |
Can't
argue, the Giants need a big target for Manning but I would have
gone with Nelson or Cook and given him his speed/height guy at
tight end. |
| 22 |
86 |
MIN |
Allen |
CB |
Georgia |
Disagree,
I had a number of corners (Harris, Lewis) rated more highly than
Asher. |
| 23 |
87 |
MIA |
Turner |
WR |
USC |
Disagree,
while he's a tall kid and could develop, I would have jumped on
Iglesias. |
| 24 |
88 |
BAL |
Webb |
CB |
Nicholls
St |
Disagree,
as a slot corner I like Munnerlyn, as a corner with starting
potential I like Macho Harris better. |
| 25 |
89 |
TEN |
Cook |
TE |
S
Carolina |
Agree
with selection |
| 26 |
90 |
ATL |
Owens |
CB |
San
Jose St |
Disagree,
see the comments for the Ravens two spots up. |
| 27 |
91 |
SEA |
Butler |
WR |
Penn
State |
Can't
argue, but I like Knox a bit more as a speed receiver. |
| 28 |
92 |
IND |
Powers |
CB |
Auburn |
Mistake,
there are a number of corners I like better than Powers at this
spot including Macho Harris, Mike Mickens and Kennan Lewis. |
| 29 |
93 |
CAR |
Irvin |
DT |
Georgia |
Can't
argue, they need a tackle and Irvin is good value, however
Nelson would have been my pick, he'll be great running down the
seam with the attention safeties need to pay to Steve Smith. |
| 30 |
94 |
TEN |
Mouton |
CB |
Hawaii |
Can't
argue, he'll be a good player, but I still have other corners
rated a little higher (Harris and Lewis the main two). |
| 31 |
95 |
ARZ |
Johnson |
FS |
Alabama |
Disagree,
a third safety over a game-changing tight end in Nelson doesn't
make sense to me. |
| 32 |
96 |
PIT |
Lewis |
CB |
Oregon
St |
Agree
with selection |
| 33 |
97 |
NE |
McKenzie |
LB |
S
Florida |
Can't
argue, but I still like Brinkley as an inside linebacker for a
3-4 team. |
| 34 |
98 |
CIN |
Coffman |
TE |
Missouri |
Disagree,
I have Nelson rated more highly. |
| 35 |
99 |
CHI |
Iglesias |
WR |
Oklahoma |
Agree
with selection |
| 36 |
100 |
NYG |
Beckham |
TE |
Wisconsin |
Disagree,
I have Nelson rated more highly. |
|