|
|
Two Round, Draft-in-Progress, Pick-by-Pick Draft Review
NOTE - these are my initial
impressions as the picks were made -
my thoughts may change when I do my detailed analysis.
POSTED
04/26/08 right after day
one of the draft
ROUND 1
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY
GOLDBERG's INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
1 |
MIA |
Dorsey |
DT |
LSU |
Can't
argue, but I think Gholston would be a sack monster in Miami's
3-4 defense. |
| 2 |
2 |
STL |
Long |
DE |
Virginia |
Disagree, I
like Carricker at end he is very big, very quick and a great
athlete and is wasted at the nose. Dorsey would have been
my pick. |
| 3 |
3 |
ATL |
Ryan |
QB |
Bost
Col |
Agree
with selection |
| 4 |
4 |
OAK |
McFadden |
RB |
Arkansas |
Can't
argue, but Oakland is deep at running back and Dorsey would have
been a needed cog in their defense. |
| 5 |
5 |
KC |
Dorsey |
DT |
LSU |
Can't
argue, assuming they get an OT later in round one. |
| 6 |
6 |
NYJ |
Gholston |
LB |
Ohio
St |
Agree
with selection |
| 7 |
7 |
NO |
Ellis |
DT |
USC |
Agree
with selection |
| 8 |
8 |
JAC |
Harvey |
DE |
Florida |
Agree
with selection |
| 9 |
9 |
CIN |
Rivers |
LB |
USC |
Agree
with selection |
| 10 |
10 |
NE |
Mayo |
LB |
Tennessee |
Can't
argue, the Pats need youth at linebacker, but Clady had to be
tempting. |
| 11 |
11 |
BUF |
McKelvin |
CB |
Troy |
Agree
with selection |
| 12 |
12 |
DEN |
Clady |
OT |
Boise
St |
Agree
with selection |
| 13 |
13 |
CAR |
Stewart |
RB |
Oregon |
Disagree, I
think Williams is a better weapon than Stewart and should have
been given a chance to start. My pick would have been
Chris Williams. |
| 14 |
14 |
CHI |
Williams |
OT |
Vanderbilt |
Agree
with selection |
| 15 |
15 |
KC |
Albert |
OT |
Virginia |
Agree
with selection |
| 16 |
16 |
ARZ |
Rodgers-
Cromartie |
CB |
Tenn
St |
Agree
with selection |
| 17 |
17 |
DET |
Cherilus |
OT |
Boston
Col |
Agree
with selection |
| 18 |
18 |
BAL |
Flacco |
QB |
Delaware |
Agree
with selection |
| 19 |
19 |
CAR |
Otah |
OT |
Pittsburgh |
Can't
argue, but if they selected Williams at #13, they wouldn't have
had to give up picks to get their tackle (then grab RB T. Choice
later). |
| 20 |
20 |
TB |
Talib |
CB |
Kansas |
Agree
with selection |
| 21 |
21 |
ATL |
Baker |
OT |
USC |
Can't
argue, the draft dictated this pick, but it is a little high for
Baker. |
| 22 |
22 |
DAL |
Jones |
RB |
Arkansas |
Mistake,
Chris Johnson would have made this team's offense much more
difficult to stop. He would help as a runner and as a
receiver split wide. |
| 23 |
23 |
PIT |
Mendenhall |
RB |
Illinois |
Can't
argue, he's a great player and too good of a value at this spot,
but they need a 3-4 end like Campbell; however, I would have
done the same thing. |
| 24 |
24 |
TEN |
Johnson |
RB |
East
Car |
Can't
argue, he's very explosive and could be their best receiver, but
with one top corner left on the board I would have gone
with Jenkins or even DE Jackson. |
| 25 |
25 |
DAL |
Jenkins |
CB |
South
Fla |
Agree
with selection |
| 26 |
26 |
HOU |
Brown |
OT |
Virg
Tech |
Mistake,
Houston traded down too far and had to reach for Brown, I'm sure
they were targeting Baker. |
| 27 |
27 |
SD |
Cason |
CB |
Arizona |
Agree
with selection |
| 28 |
28 |
SEA |
Jackson |
DE |
USC |
Disagree,
with Kerney and Tapp already on board I would have gone WR
Thomas. |
| 29 |
29 |
SF |
Balmer |
DE |
N
Carolina |
Agree
with selection |
| 30 |
30 |
NYJ |
Keller |
TE |
Purdue |
Agree
with selection |
| 30 |
30 |
NYG |
Phillips |
FS |
Miami |
Agree
with selection |
ROUND 2
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY
GOLDBERG's INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
32 |
MIA |
Merling |
DE |
Clemson |
Agree
with selection |
| 2 |
33 |
STL |
Avery |
WR |
Houston |
Agree
with selection |
| 3 |
34 |
WAS |
Thomas |
WR |
Mich
St |
Agree
with selection |
| 4 |
35 |
KC |
Flowers |
CB |
Virg
Tech |
Can't
argue, but I like Porter and Godfrey a little more than Flowers
who has great skills but suspect speed. |
| 5 |
36 |
GB |
Nelson |
WR |
Kansas
St |
Disagree,
wide receiver is deep position in draft and not a need area for
GB. Laws would have been my pick. |
| 6 |
37 |
ATL |
Lofton |
LB |
Oklahoma |
Agree
with selection |
| 7 |
38 |
SEA |
Carlson |
TE |
Notre
Dame |
Disagree,
I'm very high on TE Cottam and he would have been my pick. |
| 8 |
39 |
SF |
Rachal |
OG |
USC |
Can't
argue, but OLB Groves would have been my pick. |
| 9 |
40 |
NO |
Porter |
CB |
Indiana |
Agree
with selection |
| 10 |
41 |
BUF |
Hardy |
WR |
Indiana |
Agree
with selection |
| 11 |
42 |
DEN |
Royal |
WR |
Virg
Tech |
Can't
argue, but WRs Caldwell or Hawkins could develop into starters,
while Royal will remain a slot receiver (but a good one). |
| 12 |
43 |
MIN |
Johnson |
FS |
Ark
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 13 |
44 |
CHI |
Forte |
RB |
Tulane |
Agree
with selection |
| 14 |
45 |
DET |
Dizon |
LB |
Colorado |
Mistake,
the Lions will not forgive themselves for passing on RB Ray
Rice; Dizon is good but may be too small for the middle. |
| 15 |
46 |
CIN |
Simpson |
WR |
Coast
Car |
Mistake,
Laws would have been my pick. At receiver I would have
gone with Caldwell as a speed receiver over Simpson. |
| 16 |
47 |
PHI |
Laws |
DT |
Notre
Dame |
Agree
with selection |
| 17 |
48 |
WAS |
Davis |
TE |
USC |
Mistake,
they have Cooley; Groves would have given them a badly needed
pass rusher. |
| 18 |
49 |
PHI |
Jackson |
WR |
California |
Agree
with selection |
| 19 |
50 |
ARZ |
Campbell |
DE |
Miami |
Agree
with selection |
| 20 |
51 |
WAS |
Kelley |
WR |
Oklahoma |
Mistake,
as a receiver with size I like Sweed more than Kelly and Sweed
would have been my pick. |
| 21 |
52 |
JAC |
Groves |
DE |
Auburn |
Agree
with selection |
| 22 |
53 |
PIT |
Sweed |
WR |
Texas |
Agree
with selection |
| 23 |
54 |
TEN |
Jones |
DE |
E
Michigan |
Agree
with selection |
| 24 |
55 |
BAL |
Rice |
RB |
Rutgers |
Agree
with selection |
| 25 |
56 |
GB |
Brohm |
QB |
Louisville |
Can't
argue, but will this selection undermine the more talented
Rodgers whose job of replacing Favre is hard enough. |
| 26 |
57 |
MIA |
Henne |
QB |
Michigan |
Agree
with selection |
| 27 |
58 |
TB |
Jackson |
WR |
Appl
St |
Can't
argue, he has mad return skills, but Caldwell and Hawkins are
better receiver prospects. |
| 28 |
59 |
IND |
Pollak |
C/G |
Arz
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 29 |
60 |
GB |
Lee |
CB |
Auburn |
Can't
argue, but I like Godfrey and King a bit better than Lee but
that's splitting hairs |
| 30 |
61 |
DAL |
Bennett |
TE |
Tex
A&M |
Agree
with selection |
| 31 |
62 |
NE |
Wheatley |
CB |
Colorado |
Disagree,
a bit high for Wheatley but he should be good in NE system, but
maybe not as good as Godfrey or King. |
| 32 |
63 |
NYG |
Thomas |
CB |
USC |
Disagree,
Godfrey would have been the perfect fit here, Thomas may be a
better safety than corner in the NFL. |
|