|
|
Three
Round, Draft-in-Progress, Pick-by-Pick Draft Review
links are to NFL.com write-ups
NOTE - these are my initial
impressions as the picks were made -
my thoughts may change when I do my detailed analysis.
ROUND 1
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY GOLDBERG's
INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
1 |
Oakland |
Russell,
JaMarcus |
QB |
Louisiana
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 2 |
2 |
Detroit |
Johnson,
Calvin |
WR |
Georgia
Tech |
Can't
argue but Adams would have looked good
in Detroit uniform |
| 3 |
3 |
Cleveland |
Thomas,
Joe |
OT |
Wisconsin |
Can't
argue but Peterson would have been my
pick. |
| 4 |
4 |
Tampa
Bay |
Adams,
Gaines |
DE |
Clemson |
Agree
with selection |
| 5 |
5 |
Arizona |
Brown,
Levi |
OT |
Penn
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 6 |
6 |
Washington |
Landry,
LaRon |
FS |
Louisiana
State |
Mistake,
not because Landry isn't worth the
spot, but because he is too similar to Taylor;
Anderson or Okoye would have been my pick. |
| 7 |
7 |
Minnesota |
Peterson,
Adrian |
RB |
Oklahoma |
Agree
with selection |
| 8 |
8 |
Atlanta
|
Anderson,
Jamaal |
DE |
Arkansas |
Agree
with selection |
| 9 |
9 |
Miami |
Ginn
Jr., Ted |
WR |
Ohio
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 10 |
10 |
Houston
|
Okoye,
Amobi |
DT |
Louisville |
Mistake,
passed on another potential franchise
running back in Lynch; Green is past his prime. |
| 11 |
11 |
San
Francisco |
Willis,
Patrick |
ILB |
Mississippi |
Can't
argue, Branch has really dropped but the
big guy in the middle of the Niner defense
would have been nice. |
| 12 |
12 |
Buffalo |
Lynch,
Marshawn |
RB |
California |
Agree
with selection |
| 13 |
13 |
St.
Louis |
Carriker,
Adam |
DE |
Nebraska |
Agree
with selection |
| 14 |
14 |
N.Y.
Jets |
Revis,
Darrelle |
CB |
Pittsburgh |
Can't
argue, but Houston is the number one CB
on my board. |
| 15 |
15 |
Pittsburgh |
Timmons,
Lawrence |
OLB |
Florida
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 16 |
16 |
Green
Bay |
Harrell,
Justin |
DT |
Tennessee |
Mistake,
I like Branch better (I know he's
dropped on many draft boards) and I would
have gone TE Olsen. |
| 17 |
17 |
Denver |
Moss,
Jarvis |
DE |
Florida |
Can't
argue, but is he too similar to Dumervil? |
| 18 |
18 |
Cincinnati |
Hall,
Leon |
CB |
Michigan |
Mistake,
I read the Bengals said they were
going to pass on Branch before the draft, but if
any team needs a big body in the middle of
their defense its the Bengals. |
| 19 |
19 |
Tennessee |
Griffin,
Michael |
FS |
Texas |
Can't
argue because of problems with Pacman,
but Meriweather is a better fit alongside Hope. |
| 20 |
20 |
N.Y.
Giants |
Ross,
Aaron |
CB |
Texas |
Can't
argue, corner was the Giants' #1 need,
but Houston is going to be Pro Bowl level. |
| 21 |
21 |
Jacksonville |
Nelson,
Reggie |
FS |
Florida |
Agree
with selection |
| 22 |
22 |
Cleveland
|
Quinn,
Brady |
QB |
Notre
Dame |
Agree
with selection |
| 23 |
23 |
Kansas
City |
Bowe,
Dwayne |
WR |
Louisiana
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 24 |
24 |
New
England |
Meriweather,
Brandon |
FS |
Miami
(Fla.) |
Agree
with selection |
| 25 |
25 |
Carolina
|
Beason,
Jon |
OLB |
Miami
(Fla.) |
Can't
argue, but I like Harris better and
Spencer opposite Peppers with Rucker in
decline would have been interesting. |
| 26 |
26 |
Dallas
|
Spencer,
Anthony |
DE |
Purdue |
Agree
with selection |
| 27 |
27 |
New
Orleans |
Meachem,
Robert |
WR |
Tennessee |
Can't
argue, but Houston, Harris, Branch,
Posluszny would have upgraded their defense
and good receivers will be on the board in
round three. |
| 28 |
28 |
San
Francisco |
Staley,
Joe |
OT |
Central
Michigan |
Can't
argue, Staley has good potential, but
here I would have gone Branch for the
middle of the Niniers' defense. |
| 29 |
29 |
Baltimore |
Grubbs,
Ben |
G |
Auburn |
Agree
with selection |
| 30 |
30 |
San
Diego |
Davis,
Craig |
WR |
Louisiana
State |
Mistake,
Davis is a reach; if the Chargers
wanted to reach for a receiver here it
should have been Hill - he will be great! |
| 31 |
31 |
Chicago |
Olsen,
Greg |
TE |
Miami
(Fla.) |
Mistake,
this is not a knock on Olsen who will
upgrade their offense, but Posluszny is the
ideal replacement for Briggs and would, at
least made his potential holdout a no big thing. |
| 32 |
32 |
Indianapolis |
Gonzalez,
Anthony |
WR |
Ohio
State |
Mistake,
and I love Gonzalez as a player; the
Colts could have gone receiver later, I don't
have the same confidence they do in Keiaho;
again, Posluszny would have been my pick. |
ROUND 2
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY GOLDBERG's
INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
33 |
Arizona
|
Branch,
Alan |
DT |
Michigan |
Agree
with selection |
| 2 |
34 |
Buffalo
|
Posluszny,
Paul |
OLB |
Penn
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 3 |
35 |
Tampa
Bay |
Sears,
Arron |
OT |
Tennessee |
Agree
with selection |
| 4 |
36 |
Philadelphia
|
Kolb,
Kevin |
QB |
Houston |
Mistake,
first if going QB, Kolb would not
have been my choice, second, Houston is
the player I would have grabbed. |
| 5 |
37 |
San
Diego |
Weddle,
Eric |
SS |
Utah |
Can't
argue, but gave up too much to move
up to get him. |
| 6 |
38 |
Oakland
|
Miller,
Zach |
TE |
Arizona
State |
Mistake,
not because Miller isn't a good fit,
but with one left tackle still on the board
Ugoh should have been the pick. |
| 7 |
39 |
Atlanta
|
Blalock,
Justin |
OT |
Texas |
Agree
with selection |
| 8 |
40 |
Miami |
Beck,
John |
QB |
Brigham
Young |
Mistake,
the Dolphins will regret not taking
Stanton or Edwards, both will be better QBs
than Beck. |
| 9 |
41 |
Atlanta
|
Houston,
Chris |
CB |
Arkansas |
Agree
with selection |
| 10 |
42 |
Indianapolis
|
Ugoh,
Tony |
G |
Arkansas |
Can't
argue, but if the Colts went Posluszny
in round one, Gonzalez would have been
available here; but Ugoh is a solid pick. |
| 11 |
43 |
Detroit
|
Stanton,
Drew |
QB |
Michigan
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 12 |
44 |
Minnesota
|
Rice,
Sidney |
WR |
South
Carolina |
Can't
argue, but Hill is going to be a big-time
NFL player. |
| 13 |
45 |
Carolina |
Jarrett,
Dwayne |
WR |
Southern
California |
Agree
with selection |
| 14 |
46 |
Pittsburgh |
Woodley,
LaMarr |
DE |
Michigan |
Agree
with selection |
| 15 |
47 |
N.Y.
Jets |
Harris,
David |
ILB |
Michigan |
Agree
with selection |
| 16 |
48 |
Jacksonville |
Durant,
Justin |
ILB |
Hampton |
Can't
argue, but Smith would have been a
good pick here as well. |
| 17 |
49 |
Cincinnati |
Irons,
Kenny |
RB |
Auburn |
Mistake,
the Bengals need defense, a change
of pace back could be found later; there are
some good DEs on the board, and if they
went Branch in round one, they could have
gone CB Wilson here. |
| 18 |
50 |
Tennessee |
Henry,
Chris |
RB |
Arizona |
Mistake,
should have gone Pittman, he is the
next best runner behind Peterson and
Lynch. |
| 19 |
51 |
N.Y.
Giants |
Smith,
Steve |
WR |
Southern
California |
Mistake,
and I like Smith; there will be better
receivers in three than offensive tackles;
Marten would have been my pick. |
| 20 |
52 |
St.
Louis |
Leonard,
Brian |
FB |
Rutgers |
Agree
with selection |
| 21 |
53 |
Cleveland
|
Wright,
Eric |
CB |
Nevada-Las
Vegas |
Can't
argue, based on talent, hopefully his
off-field problems are behind him |
| 22 |
54 |
Kansas
City |
McBride,
Turk |
DT |
Tennessee |
Mistake,
too light for tackle, not a good
enough pass rusher to be a difference
maker at end; with Allen out first 4 games, I
would have gone Crowder or Abiamiri. |
| 23 |
55 |
Seattle |
Wilson,
Josh |
CB |
Maryland |
Agree
with selection |
| 24 |
56 |
Denver |
Crowder,
Tim |
DE |
Texas |
Can't
argue, but this is the second DE
drafted by Denver; at least Crowder is a
two-way end. |
| 25 |
57 |
Philadelphia |
Abiamiri,
Victor |
DE |
Notre
Dame |
Agree
with selection |
| 26 |
58 |
Detroit
|
Alama-Francis,
Ikaika |
DE |
Hawaii |
Agree
with selection |
| 27 |
59 |
Carolina
|
Kalil,
Ryan |
C |
Southern
California |
Agree
with selection |
| 28 |
60 |
Miami
|
Satele,
Samson |
C |
Hawaii |
Mistake,
Hadnot is fine at center and I would
have gone Beekman or Alleman. |
| 29 |
61 |
Detroit
|
Alexander,
Gerald |
FS |
Boise
State |
Mistake,
especially if keeping him at safety,
will be better at corner in Detroit's system
but is too high for Alexander either way; at
CB I like Wade, Young, Bennett, McCauley
more. |
| 30 |
62 |
Chicago |
Bazuin,
Dan |
DE |
Central
Michigan |
Mistake,
with questions about Benson (at
least by me), Pittman would have been my
pick. |
| 31 |
63 |
Green
Bay |
Jackson,
Brandon |
RB |
Nebraska |
Can't
argue, they need a running back and
Pittman is not a good match to pair with
Morency, if they want him to be part of
their running back rotation. |
| 32 |
64 |
Tampa
Bay |
Piscitelli,
Sabby |
SS |
Oregon
State |
Agree
with selection |
ROUND 3
| # |
Sel# |
Team |
Player |
Pos. |
School |
JAY GOLDBERG's
INITIAL COMMENT |
| 1 |
65 |
Oakland |
Moses,
Quentin |
DE |
Georgia |
Can't
argue, he could be a steal, but where is
the offensive line help? |
| 2 |
66 |
New
Orleans |
Young,
Usama |
CB |
Kent
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 3 |
67 |
Dallas
|
Marten,
James |
OT |
Boston
College |
Can't
argue, but WR Jason Hill would have
looked good in a Cowboy's uniform at this
spot. |
| 4 |
68 |
Tampa
Bay |
Black,
Quincy |
OLB |
New
Mexico |
Agree
with selection |
| 5 |
69 |
Arizona |
Davis,
Buster |
ILB |
Florida
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 6 |
70 |
Denver
|
Harris,
Ryan |
OT |
Notre
Dame |
Can't
argue, as long as the Broncos' can get
back into the mix early in day two to get a
LB like DeOssie; otherwise they should
have reached slightly here for one. |
| 7 |
71 |
Miami |
Booker,
Lorenzo |
RB |
Florida
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 8 |
72 |
Minnesota |
McCauley,
Marcus |
CB |
Fresno
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 9 |
73 |
Houston |
Jones,
Jacoby |
WR |
Lane |
Mistake,
I watched him closely in the post
season because of the hype - he is no
Colston; clearly Jason Hill should have been
the pick. |
| 10 |
74 |
Baltimore
|
Figurs,
Yamon |
WR |
Kansas
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 11 |
75 |
Atlanta |
Robinson,
Laurent |
WR |
Illinois
State |
Can't
argue, he has size and speed, and I
like him, but I'll take my track record with
WRs over Atlanta's; they will be
disappointed they passed on Hill, but not as
much as Houston; Robinson will be okay. |
| 12 |
76 |
San
Francisco |
Hill,
Jason |
WR |
Washington
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 13 |
77 |
Pittsburgh |
Spaeth,
Matt |
TE |
Minnesota |
Can't
argue, but is a blocking TE who can
catch worth this spot in the draft for the
Steelers' when they have Miller? |
| 14 |
78 |
Green
Bay |
Jones,
James |
WR |
San
Jose State |
Mistake,
he's okay, but Clowney and Allison
are much better options. |
| 15 |
79 |
Jacksonville |
Walker,
Mike |
WR |
Central
Florida |
Mistake,
sure Walker is bit faster than
Clowney and Allison, but they also ran sub-
4.4 forties; Clowney would have been my
pick. |
| |
|
Cincinnati
|
|
|
|
Took Ahmed
Brooks in supplemental draft. |
| 17 |
80 |
Tennessee |
Williams,
Paul |
WR |
Fresno
State |
Mistake,
I feel like a broken record, although
Williams makes more sense than Walker and
the two Jones; another team where I'll take
my track record for receivers. |
| 18 |
81 |
N.Y.
Giants |
Alford,
Jay |
DT |
Penn
State |
Mistake,
come on, Alford is a good kid who
will be a productive NFL player, as a
versatile sub; why give up on potential
starters here?; I like his teammate Shaw,
who could push to start at OLB much better,
or a slew of solid offensive lineman. |
| 19 |
82 |
Kansas
City |
Tyler,
DeMarcus 'Tank' |
DT |
North
Carolina State |
Agree
with selection |
| 20 |
83 |
Carolina |
Johnson,
Charles |
DE |
Georgia |
Agree
with selection |
| 21 |
84 |
St.
Louis |
Wade,
Jonathan |
CB |
Tennessee |
Agree
with selection |
| 22 |
85 |
Seattle |
Mebane,
Brandon |
DT |
California |
Can't
argue, Mebane is needed, but TE
Patrick would have been intriguing here as
well. |
| 23 |
86 |
Baltimore
|
Yanda,
Marshall |
G |
Iowa |
Can't
argue, but Barnes would have been
interesting as a potential replacement for
Thomas. |
| 24 |
87 |
Philadelphia
|
Bradley,
Stewart |
OLB |
Nebraska |
Agree
with selection |
| 25 |
88 |
New
Orleans |
Alleman,
Andy |
G |
Akron |
Agree
with selection |
| 26 |
89 |
Green
Bay |
Rouse,
Aaron |
SS |
Virginia
Tech |
Agree
with selection |
| 27 |
90 |
Philadelphia |
Hunt,
Tony |
RB |
Penn
State |
Can't
argue, but don't expect more than
short yardage form Hunt who lacks speed;
I would have taken a chance on Bush here,
with Buckhalter back for a year they could
have afforded to wait a year for
Westbrook's backup; and he has more
upside than Hunt. |
| 28 |
91 |
Oakland
|
Henderson,
Mario |
OT |
Florida
State |
Mistake,
they need a tackle, but I like
Koets, Free, Barbre much better. |
| 29 |
92 |
Buffalo
|
Edwards,
Trent |
QB |
Stanford |
Agree
with selection |
| 30 |
93 |
Chicago
|
Wolfe,
Garrett |
RB |
Northern
Illinois |
Mistake,
and the worst kind, a repeat
mistake, Wolfe is no more than a change of
pace back; Pittman would be their savior
after Benson fails to be the dominate back
the Bears are counting on. |
| 31 |
94 |
Chicago |
Okwo,
Michael |
ILB |
Stanford |
Mistake,
the Bears like Okwo more than me;
I would have gone DeOssie, Waters, or
Alexander at this spot better as future
starters for the Bears. |
| 32 |
95 |
Indianapolis |
Hughes,
Daymeion |
CB |
California |
Can't
argue, but he lacks speed, something
the Colts' defense cherishes. |
| 33 |
96 |
San
Diego |
Waters,
Anthony |
ILB |
Clemson |
Agree
with selection |
| 34 |
97 |
San
Francisco |
McDonald,
Ray |
DT |
Florida |
Agree
with selection |
| 35 |
98 |
Indianapolis
|
Pitcock,
Quinn |
DT |
Ohio
State |
Agree
with selection |
| 36 |
99 |
Oakland
|
Higgins,
Johnnie Lee |
WR |
Texas-El
Paso |
Can't
argue, if using him as a return man,
but Clowney has the mad speed that Davis
craves and will be a very good NFL WR. |
|